Since there are no currently active contests, we have switched Climate CoLab to read-only mode.
Learn more at https://climatecolab.org/page/readonly.
Skip navigation

Please find below the judging results for your proposal.

Finalist Evaluation

Judges'' comments


SUBJECT: Climate CoLab Judging Results

Proposal: Clean Energy with Social Responsibility


Thank you for participating in the 2015 Climate CoLab Energy solutions for Latin America contest, and for the time you spent in creating and revising your entry.

The Judges have strongly considered your proposal in this second round of evaluation, and have chosen to not advance it as a Finalist for this contest.

We, the Judges and contest Fellows, are truly grateful for your contribution to the Climate CoLab and for your commitment to address climate change.

We encourage you to keep developing your work. Transfer it to the Proposal Workspace to re-open it, make edits, add collaborators, and even submit it into a future contest. You can do so by logging into your account, opening your proposal, selecting the Admin tab, and clicking “Move proposal”.

We hope you will stay involved in the Climate CoLab community. Please support and comment on proposals that have been named Finalists and vote for which proposal you would like to be nominated as the contest’s Popular Choice Winner.

If you have questions, please contact the Climate CoLab staff at admin@climatecolab.org

Keep up the great work. And thank you again for being a part of this mission to harness the world’s collective efforts to develop and share innovative climate change solutions.


2015 Climate CoLab Judges

Semi-Finalist Evaluation

Judges'' ratings


Novelty:
Feasibility:
Impact:
Presentation:

Judges'' comments


SUBJECT: Your proposal has been selected as a Semi-Finalist!

Congratulations! Your proposal, "Clean Energy with Social Responsibility" in the "Energy solutions for Latin America" contest, has been selected to advance to the Semi-Finalists round.

You will be able to revise your proposal and add new collaborators if you wish, from July 1st until July 14, 2015 at 23:59pm Eastern Time.

Judges' feedback are posted under the "Evaluation" tab of your proposal. Please incorporate this feedback in your revisions, or your proposal may not be advanced to the Finalists round. We ask you to also summarize the changes that you made in the comment section of the Evaluation tab.

At the revision deadline listed below, your proposal will be locked and considered in final form. The Judges will undergo another round of evaluation to ensure that Semi-Finalist proposals have addressed the feedback given, and select which proposals will continue to the Finalists round. Finalists are eligible for the contest’s Judges Choice award, as well as for public voting to select the contest’s Popular Choice award.

Thank you for your great work and again, congratulations!

2015 Climate CoLab Judges

1comment
Share conversation: Share via:

Javier Sabogal

Jul 15, 2015
09:35

Member


1 |
Share via:
Proposal
creator
1. Where he comes up with the 63,000 USD per project. The transaction cost of 63000 USD per project is an average calculated based on an extensive scientific literature published on academic journals and reports of market stakeholders. As early as Gouvello and Coto 2003, PCF 2003, Michaelowa 2003, Krey 2005, Teri 2005. To new studies like Magnusson 2015, Watts et al. 2015, or Rahman et al. 2015. 2. Where else can this be implemented? Once the HCSRM model is proved in Latin America, the model could be implemented anywhere. It would especially benefit communities non-connected to the grid living near small streams. 3. Can you show the numbers for the 1200 rural families that would benefit from this. 1200 rural families live in isolated areas not connected to the Colombian national grid. The identification of the families and geographical location was done by the UPME (National Energy Planning Agency) in 2014. The potential for implementing the HCSRM model is big because those families are located near streams with enough flow to generate electricity. Currently, most of the non-connected population produces electricity using small diesel power plants, which is a very inefficient source due to the high operation cost and emissions. 4. What is maintenance like? Small hydropower has most of the cost on the installation stage, the idea is that the communities are involve in the process and therefore the maintenance is in their interest, reducing the need of displacing technicians to isolated areas. The gains of this approach are: a reduction of the maintenance cost, an incentive to keep the plant working, and capacity building in the community.