Skip navigation

Please find below the judging results for your proposal.

Finalist Evaluation

Judges'' comments

Thank you for participating in the 2015 Climate CoLab China's Climate Action Plan contest, and for the time you spent in creating your entry.

The Judges have strongly considered your proposal, and have chosen to not advance it as a Finalist for this contest.

We, the Judges and contest Fellows, are truly grateful for your contribution to the Climate CoLab and for your commitment to address climate change.

We encourage you to keep developing your work and to submit it into future contests, which will open in the fall and winter of 2016. In the meantime, you can keep developing your work by transferring it to the Regional Climate Action Plan Workspace (; here you can re-open it, make edits, and add collaborators. You can do so by logging into your account, opening your proposal, selecting the Admin tab, and clicking “Copy proposal”. Once the 2016 contests open, you can use this same feature to move your proposal to an open contest.

We very much hope you will stay involved in the Climate CoLab community. Please support and comment on other proposals on the platform and continue to submit your ideas into our contests.

If you have questions, please contact the Climate CoLab staff at

Keep up the great work. And thank you again for being a part of this mission to harness the world’s collective efforts to develop and share innovative climate change solutions.

All the best,
2015 Climate CoLab Judges

Judges's comments:

1, The overall rational is clear and appealing, but there is major lack of specifics with respect to technology, policy and economics options to accomplish what is proposed to make a real impact.

2, This is an interesting proposal. The problem is that there is very little new thing in the proposal that people have not heard before.

Fellows' comments:

This is a promising plan proposal with well selected/developed sub-proposals. Over all it does show a great idea in addressing climate change, which is to lead technology transition and reap the benefits of technology advancement. However, a more specific description of exactly what the author meant by technological advancement is recommended. In addition, information about ‘benefits, costs, challenges, …’ are far from adequate.

Share conversation: Share via:
No comments have been posted.