Pitch
Combine two existing waste streams Nuclear Waste & Human Excrement to generate Hydrogen into electricity, replacing Fossil Fuel electricity
Description
Summary
Radiolysis : the radiolytic decomposition of organic material generates Hydrogen "without intense heat required in conventional Nuclear & Thorium Reactors"
May not be "Cold Fusion", but its the closest thing to it.
Infrastructure modification to isolate sewage systems from extreme weather events including "flooding", to direct sewage to Conversion Facilities.
Hydrogen could be used on location to generate electricity.
S.T.O.L. Aircraft like the DHC-5, could be incorporated to transport Nuclear Waste to and from Radiolysis facilities front door. DRR proliferation concerns.
see crashhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SzMvKXP8Pc
anything not converting to hydrogen, will be disposed of using Browns Gas "transmutation", DRR increased radioactive waste concerns.
End Product Electricity would be sold similar to existing scenario's.
Category of the action
Reducing emissions from electric power sector.
What actions do you propose?
Terminating Sewage discharge into Rivers, Lakes and Oceans, the hatchery for "Superbugs" AMR.
Closed Dedicated Sewage Systems are Disaster Risk Reduction, preventing commonly additional healthcare issues following extreme weather events. While providing electricity to assist other Recovery efforts.
The cost of energy would go down, present sewage disposal
cost disappear.
Healthcare costs associated to burning Fossil Fuels illness's and Healthcare costs associated to existing sewage discharge will be dramatically reduced.
alumni of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, could provide direct advisory on a wide variety of technical issues that will arise, such as development of a Standard Reproducible Exposure condition that results in optimum Hydrogen generation.
Educating the masses to reduce Pre-Conditioned responses to the word Nuclear.
Reducing the demand for Land Use away from Bio-Fuels back to
agriculture for food.
Who will take these actions?
Government oversight of Nuclear Waste import and export issues.
specifically security of central hub facilities that distribute nuclear waste to and from regional conversion facilities.
Business, buying and selling electrical generating facilities stocks, shares.
Buying and Selling Electricity
Engineering , modification to existing sewage systems.
Labor , high tech unionized skilled jobs
Individuals, refraining from putting non organic materials into toilet.
Human Rights, energy available to all
Where will these actions be taken?
Everywhere.
How much will emissions be reduced or sequestered vs. business as usual levels?
Future Target Year 2030 Global Emissions reduction of 40%
14 tears to replace all fossil fuel powered electrical generating facilities
What are other key benefits?
Common Purpose, Common Goal, Common Enemy, for all human beings, no discrimination, inclusion defeats disillusion.
What are the proposal’s costs?
Economic costs can be minimal, should established interest's reproduce
inclusion into economics of new system. Technology transfers.
Tar Sands construction skills inclusion expedites to scale implementation
Time line
0 - 5 years initial facilities construction (medium population)
R&D required to expedite implementation of full scale facilities.1) Finding Excrement exposure parameters and factors that stimulate Optimum Sustainable Conversion Standard.2) Finding Radiolysis derived Hydrogen and Air Mixture Parameters and Factors that stimulate Optimum Sustainable Electrical Output.
R & D Replacing the Primary Viability "Unknown Variable" with a Constant Coefficient of Conversion : The volume of human excrement that is required to produce 1 GWh of electricity, following a reproducible radiation exposure "Standard" conditions.Expediting scale
5-14 years Global replacement Fossil Fuel Facilities
15,121 of em
Related proposals
not informed no opinion
References
A.V. KREBS 'Blob' Creeps Toward Columbia River http://www.populist.com/99.12.krebs.blob.html
no meltdown risk Radiolysis Fig 2.1 page 24