Please find below the
Finalist Evaluation
Judges'' ratings
| • | Novelty: | |
| • | Feasibility: | |
| • | Impact: | |
| • | Presentation: |
Judges'' comments
Thank you for your proposal!
We really appreciate how your idea was both creative and inexpensive. We felt that it was a simple solution to a bad problem. Although we liked the reuse of rubber for cement production, we do question the potential increase and energy costs associated with cement making. However, we do like how your proposal promotes a change from open burning to a more controlled environment. We further liked how the device is portable, which will reduce transportation costs and emissions. Overall, we felt that it is a great idea with tremendous potential, and we wish you luck in promoting it.
Semi-Finalist Evaluation
Judges'' ratings
| • | Novelty: | |
| • | Feasibility: | |
| • | Impact: | |
| • | Presentation: |
Judges'' comments
Thank you for your proposal to the Climate Colab contest! This is a great idea and has inexpensive cost of implementation. Here are a few questions left unaswered in your proposal that will need to be addessed to be a strong candidate for the finalist round:
1. What is the end product/situation with regard to rubber?
2. Can you provide a plan for the device? Drawing/photo?
3. Please add discussion on whether the Tyrcyler is a patented device and additional detail on how it actually works.
Best of luck in this next round of iteration!
0comments
Share conversation:
Share via:
No comments have been posted.
