Skip navigation

Please find below the judging results for your proposal.

Semi-Finalist Evaluation

Judges'' comments

Dear proposal authors,

Thank you for participating in the 2016 Climate CoLab Adaptation Plan contest, and for the time you spent in creating your entry.

The Judges have strongly considered your proposal, and have chosen to not advance it as a Semi-Finalist for this contest. Below, you can find the judges' comments.

We, the Judges and contest Fellows, are truly grateful for your contribution to the Climate CoLab and for your commitment to address climate change.

We encourage you to keep developing your work and to submit it into future contests.

We very much hope you will stay involved in the Climate CoLab community. Please support and comment on other proposals on the platform and continue to submit your ideas into our contests.

If you have questions, please contact the Climate CoLab staff at

Keep up the great work. And thank you again for being a part of this mission to harness the world’s collective efforts to develop and share innovative climate change solutions.

All the best,
2016 Climate CoLab Judges


This proposal addresses the issue of adaptation technology development and uptake in Africa. While each action proposed is valid, the pathways to uptake are unclear (who would take the action? How would you ensure buy-in? Who would maintain and repair the infrastructure etc?) Similarly, social and political dimensions of feasibility are not considered. The technologies proposed, however, are low-cost and potentially effective, which make them very desirable options. I encourage the proponents to continue to develop the details of this proposal. I do not think that this proposal should continue to the next round.

The authors should focus more on precisely their solution (the rafts and fog catchers), there is too much other text. With regard to these particular solutions, they are both very small scale, unlikely to put much of a dent in Africa's food security challenge. The large non-climatic drivers of the food security problem (population growth, relying on rain fed agriculture with little irrigation, corruption, transport infrastructure to allow better trade and movement of food regionally, are all ignored here in favor of very small scale stand alone technologies that seem to be mostly chosen because they can be 'installed easily' by an NGO. I don't find this very convincing.

Share conversation: Share via:
No comments have been posted.