Build Personal and Relational Resilience Skills to Foster True Collaboration by kartaelise

Please find below the judging results for your proposal.

Finalist Evaluation

Judges'' comments

Proposal: Build Personal & Relational Resilience Skills to Foster True Collaboration Contest: Fostering Climate Collaboration in Boulder, CO 2016 Thank you for your contest entry, Build Personal & Relational Resilience Skills to Foster True Collaboration. We appreciate your willingness to share your ideas, and also the time and effort you put into developing a proposal and submitting it to the
. As your entry did not sufficiently address some of the revisions the Judges were hoping to see, we did not advance it to the next round of competition. We encourage you to keep developing your idea. Transfer your proposal to a Workspace to re-open it, make edits, add collaborators, and even submit it into a future contest. You can do so by logging into your account, opening your proposal, selecting the Admin tab, and clicking “Move proposal.” We welcome you to stay involved in the Climate CoLab community: support and comment on proposals that have been named Finalists, and vote during the public voting period to help select the contest’s Popular Choice Winner. Climate CoLab will be opening more contests throughout the year and you are welcome to submit your proposal to those contests as well. Keep up the great work. We hope that by working together, we all can create solutions that wouldn’t otherwise be possible. Sincerely, Contest Fellows If there are additional comments from the Judges & Fellows, they will be included below.

The author did not respond to the judges' questions and prompts. Thank you for your submission!

Semi-Finalist Evaluation

Judges'' ratings

•	Novelty:
•	Feasibility:
•	Impact:
•	Presentation:

Judges'' comments

Strengths:
I believe this type of training is appropriate for addressing any business or social challenge.

Challenges to address:
Unclear how this proposal will attract the participation of individuals who are resistant to addressing climate change, absent a mandate that they take action.

More explanation of why this is an appropriate approach to addressing climate crisis

One approach, for instance, might be to connect the project more concretely with particular initiatives working to address the key contributors to the climate crisis. What, specifically, do you see as vital "leverage points" in the crisis? How can this initiative address them?

0comments

Share conversation:

No comments have been posted.