Since there are no currently active contests, we have switched Climate CoLab to read-only mode.
Learn more at
Skip navigation

Please find below the judging results for your proposal.

Finalist Evaluation

Judges'' comments

Your proposal is a huge project. How would this small grant move the work forward?

Besides it, your proposal does not quite address climate resilience effectively, as separate from climate change mitigation.

A driving principle in this proposal is that competitiveness increases resilience. In the judges opinion this is not a meaningful definition of resilience.

Semi-Finalist Evaluation

Judges'' ratings


Judges'' comments

Specific revisions requested:
1) Clearly and explicitly identify how this proposal relates to urban resilience. This contest is about adapting to a changing climate, not mitigating the causes of it.
2) Need to draw a specific link between energy independence and risks for specific cities - how will this help them be more resilient?

Judges comments:

"The proposal is well-written and compelling, but I'm not sure it meets the spirit of this particular competition."

Share conversation: Share via:
No comments have been posted.