Anna Förster Apr 29, 2014 03:54
Member
|
I like the idea. Currently, people pay taxes in some countries (e.g. Germany) to develop other regions. However, I think this punishment is exactly the problem. If we turn the idea around and offer "presents" to well-behaving towns and "cuts" to the others, this might really shift the behaviour.
The proposal itself is however rather under-developed. You should elaborate more on the details - e.g. by describing in detail one possible action for one particular town.
|
Doron Bracha Apr 30, 2014 02:31
Member
|
I agree with Anna, and would like to add a few thoughts.
One of the most important things we need to do is reduce consumption and overall carbon footprint.
Perhaps those competitions could award communities that demonstrate quantifiable improvements in public transit use and reduction in gas consumption?.. Or reduction in volume of waste and increase in recycling and composting? Or increase in renewable energy?..
Businesses that show commitment and take real measures to go green, would be able to display awards and certificates, that would promote their PR.
But that all has to be monitored and considered holistically, with a life-cycle analysis. For example, plastic bags have been banned in Brookline (and styrofoam trays as well).
Yet many people don't bother to bring their own reusable bags to Trader Joe's, since they know they'll get a lot of doubled paper bags for free. Is that practice really green?..
Or perhaps if consumers have to pay for the bags (even small amounts) they would think twice?
And maybe shoppers who bring reusable bags can somehow be rewarded over time?..
Critical thinking is required in order to determine the true value of things.
Recognizing and rewarding good environmental stewardship can certainly help. This is a good proposal that has potential for development.
Cheers !..
|
Gabriel Harp May 4, 2014 02:39
Member
|
This is a great start. A resource to check out for more info on why group affiliation matters is CRED's Guide. It tackles the psychology of social identity and how that helps link personal goals to group ones: http://guide.cred.columbia.edu/guide/sec6.html
|
Samuel M. May 7, 2014 04:00
Member
|
this has to be the blueprint for effecting any shift in behavior. the average person will be more receptive to information and more encouraged to act if the problem is presented through entities they feel they're a part of and (more importantly) want to be a part of. sports teams are the perfect example. work places, churches and associations are other examples.
ranking and reward systems always seem to work well within communities. the larger the community, and the greater the members' perception of being recognized by other members for their status, the more effective.
how you make sustainable living (and so on) a status to be desired within a large voluntary community and how you enforce or verify positive action depends on the community. so the question becomes, how do you create an initiative that a broad range of groups will be obliged to participate in, and members of the groups will want to participate in. how can such a thing be accomplished on a large enough scale without government involvement?
what about a currency or market to participate in. that's probably thinking too big but it's all I can envision right now. someone else might have more insight into that.
|
Vishal Bhavsar Jun 20, 2014 01:31
Catalyst
|
I like the idea. But the example you gave football team visiting local area and playing reduces carbon footprint. It is not clear to me.
Engaging community and getting competitive environment can have that impact.
Need more clarity on time, approach, cost to have sharpness in your proposal
|
Paulo Borges De Brito Jun 20, 2014 01:24
Member
|
I'm an economist and we believe in incentives. That's a perfect example of drive people's behavior via economic incentives. However, economic incentives needs to be well elaborated, organized, thought, and implemented. How will the implementation be done? without a good implementation plan, incentives will fail.
Paulo
|
Climate Colab Aug 5, 2014 08:46
Member
|
This proposal works with a good idea but is somewhat lacking in detail. The idea is solid enough: to leverage group psychology (us vs. them, etc.) to promote competitive environmental actions. But there's very little that is concrete here, and I would like to see more details worked out.
The proposal suggests having competitions amongst groups to take actions to reduce climate change impacts and increase sustainability. The proposal suggests prizes come from government (tax credits) or NFL teams.The appeal of this proposal is the focus on groups as the unit for action and the competition as a motivator. The challenges are that the prizes are not well-thought-through or feasible, and the platform for the competition is unclear.
|