7comments
Share conversation:
Share via:
 Robert Dedomenico May 3, 2014 12:03  |
Just set out to prove the laws of thermodynamics wrong before you bother advancing nonsense that depends on such a proof. Hint: proofs are not made by simply making false claims. You've got to demonstrate something.
|
 Jeff Harti May 8, 2014 01:21  |
@ericjcrews: Thanks for the proposal. Some more details and supporting references would be much appreciated, given what you are proposing.
|
 Tom Morris May 13, 2014 02:23 |
after looking over the link this is a perpetual motion machine design-will not work as described. If you really think it will i would suggest you build a prototype and test it.
|
 Ufroz Ayyub Jun 19, 2014 10:24  |
Any estimates on a $/kWh produced or $/mile traveled, which would allow for a comparison to existing technologies and demonstrate the competitiveness of your product?
Also a detailed schematic along with references would be helpful to better understand how the product actually functions.
|
 Mark Johnson Jun 20, 2014 07:16 |
Looking at your main URL page, you peak one's interest with so many descriptor keywords complementary to http://designdeskinc.com/Electric_Automobile.html (perpetual, electric, pneumatic, hydraulic, etc.). Newton would of course be your worst critic, but even he would want to study your diagrams with narratives explaining the "inner workings" involving multiple technologies. I have been opening each of your links to study further. Have you heard about what UPS is doing with their "hydraulic hybrid"??
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/hydraulic-hybrid3.htm
|
 Saravanan Dhalavoi Pandian Jun 20, 2014 03:00 |
Hi,
Interesting!! However, would recommend to explain the concept on more simpler terms so that it can be easily understood by everyone.
Also do you have a working model to demonstrate the concept?
Many thanks,
|
 Climate Colab Aug 13, 2014 04:18 |
