Since there are no currently active contests, we have switched Climate CoLab to read-only mode.
Learn more at https://climatecolab.org/page/readonly.
Skip navigation
12comments
Share conversation: Share via:

Unicorn Power Ltd. Martin Mizera, Md

Jun 13, 2014
02:38

Member


1 |
Share via:
Proposal
contributor
The project description will be optimized right up till the competiton deadline. Please, feel free to vote for us now and visit at a later time to see how we're doing.

Abhik Tayal

Jun 14, 2014
02:11

Member


2 |
Share via:
Hi LandGenerator, You have an interesting concept. May I request you to be more thorough in the proposal about the technology, requirements, costing. This will give you tremendous edge. Please let us know if you need any support from our side. Regards Abhik Tayal MIT Climate Co-Lb catalyst

Unicorn Power Ltd. Martin Mizera, Md

Jun 14, 2014
06:19

Member


3 |
Share via:
Proposal
contributor
Hi Abhik, What support do you have available ? We're planning to flesh out the proposal in the next few weeks. Regards, Martin Mizera, Managing Director

Mark Johnson

Jun 17, 2014
03:50

Member


4 |
Share via:
Hello Martin. Your proposal really tweaked my research interest. I think you're on solid footing with the understandable constraint being biomass source location and availability. Wanted to share these two Waste Management World (WMW) URLs with you and the community. Note the comment about the biomass Euro EIBI: http://www.waste-management-world.com/articles/print/volume-12/issue-6/features/biowaste-driving-fuels.html WMW offers free subscriptions - looks like an excellent URL: https://www.sub-forms.com/dragon/init.do?site=PNW38_WXnew&pk=WMWE34 I hear China is also looking at small, portable nuclear powered generators which will connect, forming a power grid anywhere in the world. Our NIF is looking at fusion pellets which offers portability: http://www.wired.com/2014/02/fusion-power-not-yet/ Thank you for your efforts. Biomass solutions will surely gain importance and widespread use, no doubt. Mark

Felipe De Leon

Jun 18, 2014
01:55

Member


5 |
Share via:
You make some extremely attractive claims in your proposal, which make it very interesting. I suggest adding additional details that allow some understanding of the technology that underpins your proposal would make your it a lot more compelling. I look forward to reading further technical details.

Michael Brown

Jun 20, 2014
09:47

Catalyst


6 |
Share via:
Thank you for submitting this proposal. The modular nature and ability to provide baseload power are both very attractive. As I understand it, this proposal is essentially for a biomass reactor with a novel form of gas cleaning technology. I have a few comments: 1. Some description of the functioning of the scrubber would be helpful. As well, you should include references to the patents and other sources. 2. You mention that this technology could be used 'anywhere', but you contradict yourself later when you say it requires a close source of waste feedstock. 3. Did you forget a few decimal places in your cost estimate? $1.5/kW capex puts this technology at about 3 orders of magnitude less than existing technologies. Check the data under the 'OpenEI Database' section of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source#US_Department_of_Energy_estimates. Best of luck, Mike

Michael Brown

Jun 20, 2014
09:35

Catalyst


7 |
Share via:
EDIT: zeros, not decimal places.

Fan Tastic

Jun 25, 2014
02:48

Member


8 |
Share via:
My project People Overloading On Protien is similar in that I wish to use the errr, biomas of humans to produce power. also captured methane

Climate Colab

Aug 13, 2014
04:20

Member


9 |
Share via:
An interesting approach but it is highly dependent on how the technology works , which is neither explained or validated. On-site generation and direct waste to electricity are promising technologies that should be developed further. Approach of addressing off-grid markets first is a sound approach.Need a good manufacturing partner once feasibility is proven.The most important early step here is to build a prototype that shows the technology works and proves the emissions claims. The concept is small, 24/7 containerized power plants with no CO2 emissions at a very low price, i.e. below $1.50/kWe. While the overall approach seems a very reasonable one, there is a lack of information on the two key points: the "novel electric scrubber" and how to reach "below than $1.50/kWe. The technology and the cost associated with it have to be demonstrated. Since the relatively small scale proposed from each plant, it should not be difficult to produce a few demos.

Martin Mizera

Feb 15, 2016
12:10

Member


10 |
Share via:

Demos have been built, the cold-plasma technology is ready and the markets are waiting.

Can we re-submit for 2016 ?

 


Martin Mizera

Feb 15, 2016
02:29

Member


11 |
Share via:

Demos have been built, the cold-plasma technology is ready and the markets are waiting.

Can we re-submit for 2016 ?

 


Annalyn Bachmann

Feb 17, 2016
09:42

Staff


12 |
Share via:

Hello autoidea, 

Yes! We'll be launching the 2016 round of contests very soon. We welcome your proposal and great ideas!

Thank you, 

Annalyn Bachmann
Project Assistant with the Climate CoLab